「抄襲」不是用「兩個文本擁有相同的一句話」就可以定義的。479Please respect copyright.PENANAUrIzg76CWs
479Please respect copyright.PENANAjnO1j4xtkn
書名和標題也是,撞句、撞名不能算抄襲,「抄襲」是很嚴重的指控,在指控他人抄襲時,要先把證據擺出來。479Please respect copyright.PENANAczfC2d82oJ
479Please respect copyright.PENANA4L3Vrwpgoh
這就是「舉證之所在,敗訴之所在」。479Please respect copyright.PENANAJR7VvRN51g
479Please respect copyright.PENANAJMW1CyVQVf
翻成白話文就是:提告者要負舉證之責任,如果證據不足或不被採用,則可能導致敗訴。479Please respect copyright.PENANA2IVjNGnznN
479Please respect copyright.PENANAQ8rhToNOmd
【全國法規資料庫:著作權法】479Please respect copyright.PENANACvtfashVnH
479Please respect copyright.PENANAofjjIDLXd9
reurl.cc/OvGelX479Please respect copyright.PENANAPBNdvCSfl9
479Please respect copyright.PENANA7FALw93a1K
【著作權筆記:「抄襲」有無明確的定義】479Please respect copyright.PENANAFNu4pAeRme
479Please respect copyright.PENANA2EViKioAkd
reurl.cc/RzWQx9479Please respect copyright.PENANAmYOj3boVaV
479Please respect copyright.PENANAupJmu01ytr
【音樂侵權的認定,更複雜】479Please respect copyright.PENANAZY12xRBOUf
479Please respect copyright.PENANAjKqRM7s6WK
crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16062479Please respect copyright.PENANAT1nR2Ju01M
479Please respect copyright.PENANAfx7bNTidCF
這裡說明一下:法律並沒有「抄襲」字樣,著作權法和「抄襲」有關的是「重製」、「改作」。479Please respect copyright.PENANAXBcCfldBs2
479Please respect copyright.PENANAqaX8XOO3cT
然後,學術上的認定比法律嚴格,因為法律是社會的安全網,算是底線,如果太過嚴格,會導致民眾動不動就觸法,也會讓有心人士拿著法條當攻擊武器 (我一直認為法條是防禦/護身武器,而非攻擊武器),這也是為何法律非常重視程序和證據的主因。