「抄襲」不是用「兩個文本擁有相同的一句話」就可以定義的。478Please respect copyright.PENANAYr7VFaCTXj
478Please respect copyright.PENANAykdOk5e8Wt
書名和標題也是,撞句、撞名不能算抄襲,「抄襲」是很嚴重的指控,在指控他人抄襲時,要先把證據擺出來。478Please respect copyright.PENANA29M5ecgJBH
478Please respect copyright.PENANAfD1B3hD5ka
這就是「舉證之所在,敗訴之所在」。478Please respect copyright.PENANAq4nSVjFxSL
478Please respect copyright.PENANAJzCdthKzkI
翻成白話文就是:提告者要負舉證之責任,如果證據不足或不被採用,則可能導致敗訴。478Please respect copyright.PENANAbqRK6AsoST
478Please respect copyright.PENANAeeRiiqhD0W
【全國法規資料庫:著作權法】478Please respect copyright.PENANArlk1leKf3H
478Please respect copyright.PENANAASjlqIWqa7
reurl.cc/OvGelX478Please respect copyright.PENANANWo0W2SUvc
478Please respect copyright.PENANAjqun4NvZLY
【著作權筆記:「抄襲」有無明確的定義】478Please respect copyright.PENANAMDqsAUfVFu
478Please respect copyright.PENANAD4EXqh3lVp
reurl.cc/RzWQx9478Please respect copyright.PENANAfkz5NHOwko
478Please respect copyright.PENANA9x4voRtns6
【音樂侵權的認定,更複雜】478Please respect copyright.PENANAbugMqttVTN
478Please respect copyright.PENANAQTsG1a6u0z
crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16062478Please respect copyright.PENANAeFWek4UODf
478Please respect copyright.PENANAtGJEv755YF
這裡說明一下:法律並沒有「抄襲」字樣,著作權法和「抄襲」有關的是「重製」、「改作」。478Please respect copyright.PENANAyBGgxUzkNP
478Please respect copyright.PENANAQakkRZf4E3
然後,學術上的認定比法律嚴格,因為法律是社會的安全網,算是底線,如果太過嚴格,會導致民眾動不動就觸法,也會讓有心人士拿著法條當攻擊武器 (我一直認為法條是防禦/護身武器,而非攻擊武器),這也是為何法律非常重視程序和證據的主因。