「抄襲」不是用「兩個文本擁有相同的一句話」就可以定義的。476Please respect copyright.PENANA6VQrfGDSoU
476Please respect copyright.PENANASyvjJOqKp2
書名和標題也是,撞句、撞名不能算抄襲,「抄襲」是很嚴重的指控,在指控他人抄襲時,要先把證據擺出來。476Please respect copyright.PENANAuKoTLfkAUO
476Please respect copyright.PENANATO04y3i1JQ
這就是「舉證之所在,敗訴之所在」。476Please respect copyright.PENANANA0AjQi4X8
476Please respect copyright.PENANAGMjA0eydYo
翻成白話文就是:提告者要負舉證之責任,如果證據不足或不被採用,則可能導致敗訴。476Please respect copyright.PENANAdDdT0ExfGG
476Please respect copyright.PENANAUMKIS4yUC3
【全國法規資料庫:著作權法】476Please respect copyright.PENANA3Ws3TVvmpW
476Please respect copyright.PENANAmTXcRLM3Aa
reurl.cc/OvGelX476Please respect copyright.PENANA4hkO42e1ag
476Please respect copyright.PENANABKA9Cefysu
【著作權筆記:「抄襲」有無明確的定義】476Please respect copyright.PENANAuU8sRXPYWW
476Please respect copyright.PENANAEQL0tUhxv6
reurl.cc/RzWQx9476Please respect copyright.PENANAQBTFOcU1IA
476Please respect copyright.PENANAvtPtgx19PO
【音樂侵權的認定,更複雜】476Please respect copyright.PENANACIH9cQCqp9
476Please respect copyright.PENANA0R1Fag33yk
crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16062476Please respect copyright.PENANAITVACAdRg8
476Please respect copyright.PENANAlKTPvatGGS
這裡說明一下:法律並沒有「抄襲」字樣,著作權法和「抄襲」有關的是「重製」、「改作」。476Please respect copyright.PENANAS4hf568mgP
476Please respect copyright.PENANA9ZWrwtl6ey
然後,學術上的認定比法律嚴格,因為法律是社會的安全網,算是底線,如果太過嚴格,會導致民眾動不動就觸法,也會讓有心人士拿著法條當攻擊武器 (我一直認為法條是防禦/護身武器,而非攻擊武器),這也是為何法律非常重視程序和證據的主因。