「抄襲」不是用「兩個文本擁有相同的一句話」就可以定義的。221Please respect copyright.PENANA3UJW1KPKMC
221Please respect copyright.PENANAcfqWLn3yqM
書名和標題也是,撞句、撞名不能算抄襲,「抄襲」是很嚴重的指控,在指控他人抄襲時,要先把證據擺出來。221Please respect copyright.PENANAxqHHAZcJ5T
221Please respect copyright.PENANAb3fQ4XRFbd
這就是「舉證之所在,敗訴之所在」。221Please respect copyright.PENANAITLFolNbjq
221Please respect copyright.PENANABRSh9O1izp
翻成白話文就是:提告者要負舉證之責任,如果證據不足或不被採用,則可能導致敗訴。221Please respect copyright.PENANARU0oxFoa3f
221Please respect copyright.PENANA2UJCiPWEW1
【全國法規資料庫:著作權法】221Please respect copyright.PENANAqs70fFUxSs
221Please respect copyright.PENANA9XkVm9ko9b
reurl.cc/OvGelX221Please respect copyright.PENANAI3rflt3kBv
221Please respect copyright.PENANAa7PXKtGpGV
【著作權筆記:「抄襲」有無明確的定義】221Please respect copyright.PENANAvQyqSfQkkQ
221Please respect copyright.PENANA3IFTQshOhP
reurl.cc/RzWQx9221Please respect copyright.PENANAXh0lf16Wp7
221Please respect copyright.PENANAgp3sBW5YTk
【音樂侵權的認定,更複雜】221Please respect copyright.PENANAEtkGykzj4h
221Please respect copyright.PENANAgLzbyPnDka
crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16062221Please respect copyright.PENANAS5yIgErJUM
221Please respect copyright.PENANAjSEnpFDKH0
這裡說明一下:法律並沒有「抄襲」字樣,著作權法和「抄襲」有關的是「重製」、「改作」。221Please respect copyright.PENANAzPALX61NNh
221Please respect copyright.PENANAxRZPcDmvUf
然後,學術上的認定比法律嚴格,因為法律是社會的安全網,算是底線,如果太過嚴格,會導致民眾動不動就觸法,也會讓有心人士拿著法條當攻擊武器 (我一直認為法條是防禦/護身武器,而非攻擊武器),這也是為何法律非常重視程序和證據的主因。