「抄襲」不是用「兩個文本擁有相同的一句話」就可以定義的。226Please respect copyright.PENANAbKO7ycdTI7
226Please respect copyright.PENANA0VAj5OC9Gv
書名和標題也是,撞句、撞名不能算抄襲,「抄襲」是很嚴重的指控,在指控他人抄襲時,要先把證據擺出來。226Please respect copyright.PENANAM3UzFJuEz3
226Please respect copyright.PENANAbVa8cHv4Zj
這就是「舉證之所在,敗訴之所在」。226Please respect copyright.PENANAWUAFSSvNy2
226Please respect copyright.PENANA6UfGlntTOr
翻成白話文就是:提告者要負舉證之責任,如果證據不足或不被採用,則可能導致敗訴。226Please respect copyright.PENANA6MEjiQU1dk
226Please respect copyright.PENANA2JJ310j32T
【全國法規資料庫:著作權法】226Please respect copyright.PENANAtYaOhLYdGE
226Please respect copyright.PENANAqnkFHvo85A
reurl.cc/OvGelX226Please respect copyright.PENANA9NxcWWvUA7
226Please respect copyright.PENANAGpxUwaLDnP
【著作權筆記:「抄襲」有無明確的定義】226Please respect copyright.PENANArNwb4q7h60
226Please respect copyright.PENANAx2i2zq0GCf
reurl.cc/RzWQx9226Please respect copyright.PENANAFsFlEkKA3F
226Please respect copyright.PENANALTcLm4sJ4J
【音樂侵權的認定,更複雜】226Please respect copyright.PENANAoTm4jhWbQh
226Please respect copyright.PENANAkTU2W08kuB
crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16062226Please respect copyright.PENANADZT8TukqKd
226Please respect copyright.PENANA9MShk5Yfmh
這裡說明一下:法律並沒有「抄襲」字樣,著作權法和「抄襲」有關的是「重製」、「改作」。226Please respect copyright.PENANA7A6JS11LXP
226Please respect copyright.PENANAY9yLBrY0qD
然後,學術上的認定比法律嚴格,因為法律是社會的安全網,算是底線,如果太過嚴格,會導致民眾動不動就觸法,也會讓有心人士拿著法條當攻擊武器 (我一直認為法條是防禦/護身武器,而非攻擊武器),這也是為何法律非常重視程序和證據的主因。