「抄襲」不是用「兩個文本擁有相同的一句話」就可以定義的。225Please respect copyright.PENANAU63YszV7fC
225Please respect copyright.PENANAbpa7Olc5Wg
書名和標題也是,撞句、撞名不能算抄襲,「抄襲」是很嚴重的指控,在指控他人抄襲時,要先把證據擺出來。225Please respect copyright.PENANAsiKK9DzmO1
225Please respect copyright.PENANASvqJ9Iy47o
這就是「舉證之所在,敗訴之所在」。225Please respect copyright.PENANAvpvv05f4Ny
225Please respect copyright.PENANA30EYfobrOy
翻成白話文就是:提告者要負舉證之責任,如果證據不足或不被採用,則可能導致敗訴。225Please respect copyright.PENANAQIoPexo1B2
225Please respect copyright.PENANAvapKopYO9b
【全國法規資料庫:著作權法】225Please respect copyright.PENANAoivBPHSqSn
225Please respect copyright.PENANA79ZGLQfiUv
reurl.cc/OvGelX225Please respect copyright.PENANADp1rxBNpUl
225Please respect copyright.PENANAWFbveF6oxC
【著作權筆記:「抄襲」有無明確的定義】225Please respect copyright.PENANAtVXZO3TudI
225Please respect copyright.PENANAjMzSF1gwTd
reurl.cc/RzWQx9225Please respect copyright.PENANAYKSivnxkb8
225Please respect copyright.PENANArYPvIAHKTX
【音樂侵權的認定,更複雜】225Please respect copyright.PENANAolQXvmjgE1
225Please respect copyright.PENANAFAKblfPGw9
crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16062225Please respect copyright.PENANAPihE7pW6q8
225Please respect copyright.PENANAqrHR8rGxgy
這裡說明一下:法律並沒有「抄襲」字樣,著作權法和「抄襲」有關的是「重製」、「改作」。225Please respect copyright.PENANANSU0Uc5b5d
225Please respect copyright.PENANASGiNmfYIR0
然後,學術上的認定比法律嚴格,因為法律是社會的安全網,算是底線,如果太過嚴格,會導致民眾動不動就觸法,也會讓有心人士拿著法條當攻擊武器 (我一直認為法條是防禦/護身武器,而非攻擊武器),這也是為何法律非常重視程序和證據的主因。