多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:536Please respect copyright.PENANALUevRs4Lt4
536Please respect copyright.PENANA7Te9LeXF8P
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?536Please respect copyright.PENANANF7BqtP7o5
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區536Please respect copyright.PENANAv88xN6h70z
https://lih.kg/2544217536Please respect copyright.PENANAIt9zuO9sfw
536Please respect copyright.PENANAfzxMpFSrnA
536Please respect copyright.PENANAJ1inzMdT3D
圖片摘取自Ref1及2536Please respect copyright.PENANAKC6KbvOuUD536Please respect copyright.PENANA7ciR1pAAuq
536Please respect copyright.PENANATTDmWTkVZz
536Please respect copyright.PENANAcujGdyjgjw
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。536Please respect copyright.PENANAH6pIkrQbUL
536Please respect copyright.PENANA4mBBom2hs3
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。536Please respect copyright.PENANA9pKTVUj33H
536Please respect copyright.PENANAv5ftD63D7K
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。536Please respect copyright.PENANADId3UpZvXQ
536Please respect copyright.PENANArcm5EbR4AO
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。536Please respect copyright.PENANAJWJo9Nl1WD
536Please respect copyright.PENANAVfDVLJwKnB
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5536Please respect copyright.PENANAK8Ll0GQMTa
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
536Please respect copyright.PENANA89uXNErOZb