多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:488Please respect copyright.PENANArla4q3szrl
488Please respect copyright.PENANAcEwDflXSLN
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?488Please respect copyright.PENANAaUAtwJBZ2k
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區488Please respect copyright.PENANAJwHcC3Rspd
https://lih.kg/2544217488Please respect copyright.PENANANZ7pWJIUli
488Please respect copyright.PENANAJ60tyDp27T
488Please respect copyright.PENANArwliN6K3ZK
圖片摘取自Ref1及2488Please respect copyright.PENANAg0dAUBqkGJ488Please respect copyright.PENANA3g8TGj5Jxc
488Please respect copyright.PENANAmnF6dgzbGH
488Please respect copyright.PENANAIFINhYxmxo
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。488Please respect copyright.PENANAnlpZ1fPtKP
488Please respect copyright.PENANAPf3G77WZfH
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。488Please respect copyright.PENANAw4ROwdTcGb
488Please respect copyright.PENANA9003MnCJMo
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。488Please respect copyright.PENANAbzCv9PVdZl
488Please respect copyright.PENANAHKsoqkk8NJ
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。488Please respect copyright.PENANAyfGrlfFeEn
488Please respect copyright.PENANAqFFscgsW8Z
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5488Please respect copyright.PENANAxi22KKQune
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
488Please respect copyright.PENANAW3xBSX5jTW