多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:459Please respect copyright.PENANALJR8NreDUM
459Please respect copyright.PENANAnygNi9WMnE
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?459Please respect copyright.PENANAkFK4tZowQQ
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區459Please respect copyright.PENANA0cszc1e2Fa
https://lih.kg/2544217459Please respect copyright.PENANAibgMtJOajo
459Please respect copyright.PENANAah2Vgw9FRc
459Please respect copyright.PENANAuKBDTkPKMe
圖片摘取自Ref1及2459Please respect copyright.PENANAg2zFba5Gbw459Please respect copyright.PENANAp6XzWig9ef
459Please respect copyright.PENANAEzZxKyjNZ5
459Please respect copyright.PENANAPYzW4cotKp
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。459Please respect copyright.PENANAL0pz912DqQ
459Please respect copyright.PENANAfhwKrKX0Cx
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。459Please respect copyright.PENANAsAB0LJq13j
459Please respect copyright.PENANAgsqcrXa0xX
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。459Please respect copyright.PENANAq1NpLd9WwB
459Please respect copyright.PENANAq5I9eAqgEO
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。459Please respect copyright.PENANAG6n4YfXaaU
459Please respect copyright.PENANATlt2zqXcqg
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5459Please respect copyright.PENANA5KzjaammFz
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
459Please respect copyright.PENANAqHbREuN7xL