多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:471Please respect copyright.PENANAhZzsGkx5pC
471Please respect copyright.PENANABtlu004dDW
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?471Please respect copyright.PENANAhnp3dv5hDh
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區471Please respect copyright.PENANAe5ixHVyVNG
https://lih.kg/2544217471Please respect copyright.PENANAWu1ijssGdn
471Please respect copyright.PENANA4GEkSUE5mU
471Please respect copyright.PENANAC78WWSsPdj
圖片摘取自Ref1及2471Please respect copyright.PENANA2E1Ge9y8xC471Please respect copyright.PENANAQc7CROWr3C
471Please respect copyright.PENANA7Gj4Nrae7z
471Please respect copyright.PENANAwrAOOSoGrh
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。471Please respect copyright.PENANAhXcBrVB4xt
471Please respect copyright.PENANA11wuQvWi9S
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。471Please respect copyright.PENANAMeP7km4JzP
471Please respect copyright.PENANAt8M8E2Mdi4
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。471Please respect copyright.PENANA7ysZpghKKe
471Please respect copyright.PENANA4B3MyKse3I
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。471Please respect copyright.PENANAxGH93iLWvD
471Please respect copyright.PENANARcdjW7mq4o
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5471Please respect copyright.PENANA5mBL4XZPcC
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
471Please respect copyright.PENANAjcJ8p7DF9j